Gazette Ceases Publication: Donates Archives to LHS

In 2010, the Larchmont Gazette ceased publication. In 2011 the publishers donated all contents to the Larchmont Historical Society, which will continue to make the Gazette archives available online.

All inquiries should be addressed to the Larchmont Historical Society.

6 comments - (Comments closed)

Teachers Decline to Reopen Contract; District Prepares to Cut Budget

The Mamaroneck Teachers Association (MTA) has declined to reopen the teachers’ contract with the school district, reported Superintendent Paul Fried in an interview on January 27.   Nevertheless, Dr. Fried is moving ahead in his budget preparation and will be exploring potential budget reductions at school board meetings on February 2 and February 9.

Did the District Ask and Did the Teachers Respond?

At the November 30 special meeting on next year’s budget and “ever since,” Dr. Fried said community members have been asking if the district has requested teachers to renegotiate their contract.

In November, Dr. Fried advised the community that if last year’s budget were simply “rolled over,” the cost of providing the same programs and services would result in a 9% budget increase.  More than half of that increase would come from contractual increases in salary and benefits.

Recognizing that a 9% budget increase is too big for the community to bear, Dr. Fried said he is looking for ways to reduce the gap between that budget and one the community is likely to approve.  “The gap has to be filled,” he acknowledged.  “It’s just a question of how.”

Yes, The District Asked: Dr. Fried confirmed that the district had made a formal request in a letter dated January 4 and presented to the MTA leadership. Before that there had been weeks of informal meetings and discussions.  “They knew it was coming,” said Dr. Fried.

The letter asked for reconsideration of salaries and benefits and changes to other contractual provisions that Dr. Fried believes limit the district’s ability to innovate.

According to Dr. Fried, by letter dated January 7, the teachers’ union declined to reopen the contract. The MTA left open the possibility that it would discuss initiatives that did not alter contractual language.

Further discussions, however, revealed that many of the innovations the district would like to explore would require alteration of contractual language.  “Everything of substance that could help with budget reduction while preserving programs and class size comes within the contract,” said Dr. Fried.

What Innovations Would the District Like to Pursue?

Dr. Fried believes that current contractual limitations “tie our hands” in terms of using creative solutions to address the budget gap.  “We’re being left with no room to do the things that will be the least harmful,” he said.

For example, the contract prevents any schedule changes at a secondary school unless two thirds of the teachers there approve.  This precludes reconfiguring the school day – such as shortening or lengthening periods – without faculty approval, even if there is no change to when students arrive or depart.

Dr. Fried said the contract would also preclude the high school from relaxing class size guidelines to implement a “college model” that combined larger group lectures with small group instruction for certain Advanced Placement or other  higher level classes.  Dr. Fried noted that creative, innovative solutions to immediate problems sometimes result in positive change in the long term.

Make no mistake, though.  Dr. Fried does not believe the alternative initiatives he will be proposing to close the budget gap are “educationally defensible.”

They’re “the best of the worst,” he said – the least harmful changes that can reduce the budget to a level he believes taxpayers can bear.

Dr. Fried would like to minimize staffing cuts, as well as the “unfortunate impact” that cuts would have on students, by looking for help from the teachers union.  Although there are five bargaining units in the district, teachers account for more than half of the employees and close to 75% of total salaries.

In looking for programs to cut, Dr. Fried cautioned against the community or faculty making comparisons from building to building.  The fact that the district values the middle school model or “capstone programs” such as Chinese 5 at the high school may be “hard for elementary teachers to understand,” he noted.

As superintendent, Dr. Fried explained, he is charged with taking the broader view.  “It’s like being a parent,” he said.  “Being fair doesn’t mean everyone gets the same thing.  You get what you need.”

Will the Teachers Reconsider?

According to Dr. Fried, MTA president Ann Borsellino indicated that before the teachers could consider reopening the contract, they needed to see the proposed budget so they could be sure the district “has cut what it can cut.”

Neither Ms. Borsellino nor other representatives of the MTA could be reached for comment.

Editor’s Update: See Ms. Borsellino\’s reply issued on February 1.

Budget Cuts To Be Presented: Feb 2 & 9

At the school board study session on February 2, Dr. Fried and his team will be presenting a variety of budget reduction initiatives, including some that would require changes in the teachers contract. (Check the district website for time and location.)

In general, Dr. Fried will present two or more levels of potential reduction for each budget area, together with specific information about impacts on the overall budget and a recommended course of action.

All building principals and directors will be present to assist the central administrators in answering questions.

The February 2 meeting will be a real working session for the school board, which will be seeing the presentation for the first time.  “We will be hearing a number of possible scenarios,” Ms. Tse explained, “all bad.”

Although the format of the meeting is not yet set, Ms. Tse expects board members to have lots of questions.  The discussion will continue at a second budget reduction initiative workshop the following week, on February 9.

There will be a short introduction, but Dr. Fried encourages community members to review the Budget Communications page and Frequently Asked Questions on the district website before attending the meeting, since there will little time to review background information presented at earlier events.   There will be lots of ground to cover and he hopes to lay out all budget scenarios at the first meeting.

The Budget Communications materials may also help community members “think through” the possible initiatives and formulate comments and questions, noted Dr. Fried.

PrintFriendlyTwitterGoogle GmailYahoo MailShare

Related Articles:

6 comments to Teachers Decline to Reopen Contract; District Prepares to Cut Budget

  • Mayor Bloomberg is cutting $5 billion from NYC budget and has offered the teachers unions two choices. Either except a 2% pay cut or face layoffs. Isn’t there an easier way in our area, if the pay could just be frozen for three years with no one being fired. In addition top pay above $150,000 could be cut by 10 to 15%. Currently salaries, benefits, and retirement pay equals approximately 85% of the budget, So if it was frozen then taxes would not have to rise, which would benefit many homeowners who are struggling with their taxes. If the remaining 15% of the budget was cut by 10% a year over the next three years. So in effect expenses could be reduced by 1.5% a year or 4.5% over the next three years. tax reductions could be made. if all personnel accepted a pay freeze for three years, those earning above $150,000 would take a 10 to 15% pay cut, and the remaining 15% of the budget not related to teaching expenses was cut by 10% a year over the next three years. Tough times call for prudent action. With this approach no one would have to lose their job, and expenses would be cut so that homeowners would not have tax increases.

  • Anon E Mous

    I prefer the company of peasants because they have not been educated sufficiently to reason incorrectly. (Michel Eyquem de Montaigne).

    And now, unfortunately, on with the show.

    But there’s no more money for increased ticket prices.

    And forget about educating students — those things like economics, conflict resolution, community.

  • let me think

    One of the FAQ I did not see answered on the District Budget websites pages is how on earth the taypayers and parents are led to pay for the salary and benefits of the President of the Teachers’ Union. Surely, and especially in light of her conflicted and unhelpful attitude, ehe has no place on the payroll (see, p.73). If the Union members wants a President, they can pay for it themselves.

    Also, a few years (looks like decades) ago, two guidance counselors were reassigned pending review of their status. Are they still drawing salaries and benefits doing nothing of relevance? When will this end and why are we not informed? ref here

  • Frug Al

    “the contract prevents any schedule changes at a secondary school unless two thirds of the teachers there approve”. Who agreed to such an insane provision?
    We should take a leaf from Mayor Bloomberg and tell teachers they have a choice between a pay cut and layoffs.

  • Anon E Mous

    Rage is the only quality which has kept me, or anybody I have ever studied, writing columns for newspapers. – Jimmy Breslin.

    So our relatively small school district is paying a search firm to conduct a national search for a new superintendent to be paid a salary exceeding that of the chancellor of the NYC school system. But the new superintendent won’t be allowed to lead and manage our school district and the education of the students.

    So the school district, i.e. ‘we’, are paying an ‘administration’ to lead and manage our schools and the education of the students.

    As it appears from what ‘they’ and apparently the contract the district agreed to may also say, prevents our ‘leadership’ and ‘administration’ from running the schools. Or perhaps it permits them to run the schools, but just not to lead the education of the students :-)

    Just who is running the asylum?

    let me think – Certainly hope the ‘contract’ permits you to do that :-)

    Frug Al – Yes, at least a leaf from the pages of the NYC school system. Of course, sure you remember that the Mayor of NYC went to Albany to take responsibility for the education of the students in the city; leadership! Perhaps NYC can transmit some leadership skills too.

    Just maybe, we should not even be having or running :-) a small school district here, there are alternatives – let us think :-)

    Remember the words of Alexandre Ledru-Rollin, ‘There go my people. I must find out where they are going so I can lead them.’

  • David Silverstone

    It should be quite clear that neither the MTA or the BOE in the Mamaroneck School District have any grasp of the reality surrounding us. An extraordinary number of residents in Our Town including both Villages are unemployed. That includes not only middle class families but upper class as well. How in the world does the BOE expect us to pay our taxes if they have contracted to provide the teaching faculty of our schools with salary increases, health benefits and job security that most Americans no longer have. Those of us who moved to Larchmont to give our children a fine education can no longer afford gold hand-carved School signs, I.M.Pei like atrium entrances to MHS, facilities that rival the finest private four-year colleges and universities and a fierce swat team of athletic coaches and teachers who will stop at nothing to get the budgets they think they need. Meetings to review the budget are a total waste of taxpayer time if the BOE has no ability to persuade the MTA to try to be reasonable. The BOE has no self-control over their need to hire consultants and the most expensive search firm in the country. Are there no people in our communities and the educational system who have the backbone to say “NO”. As a person who developed and taught “Creative Problem Solving” for college seniors and graduate students, I loved to teach. I accepted what our school system’s teachers would call petty cash. Teaching was and should be the greatest reward.