
March
19, 1942
LARCHMONT GETS PRIORITY RATING AS TARGET AREA
Village
Held Most Threatened By Enemy Attack; Supervisor McCulloch
To Protest.
The
Village of Larchmont is one of nine communities in Westchester
given priority rating by the Army and Navy and distribution
of equipment and materials for civilian defense, County
Executive Herbert C. Gerlach was informed on Tuesday
by Major General L. D. Gasser, War Department member
of the Board for Civilian Defense.
The
nine municipalities, selected for priorities because
of “likelihood of attack because of its importance
to national defense and its location,” are Yonkers,
Tarrytown, Port Chester, Ossining, Mount Vernon, Larchmont,
Irvington, Hastings and the Town of Cortlandt.
Informed
of the selections, Supervisor Bert C. McCulloch today
communicated by telephone with Mr. Gerlach, who said
he could shed no light on why those particular communities
were chosen. Mr. McCulloch said he would write to Major
General Gasser.
In
his letter, Mr. McCulloch said he will suggest a different
procedure, distribution of civilian defense supplies
and equipment through the Town Board to help components
of the Township. He will ask, he said, Mayor James T.
Corrigan of Mamaroneck and Mayor Harry E. Goeckler of
Larchmont to concur in the request.
Mayor
Corrigan said today he would not only concur but that
he would request the Supervisor Arthur G. Sammarco of
the Town of Rye to write a similar protest. Mayor Corrigan
pointed out that part of the Village of Mamaroneck is
in the Town of Rye, as is Port Chester, one of the nine
municipalities picked for priorities.
Village
engineer Arthur Richards of Larchmont today said he
was not aware of the preference given Larchmont, and
said the Village had made no application for defense
acquit. He could suggest no reason for Larchmont being
considered more vital to national defense than its neighboring
communities.
Mr.
Gerlach had written the Army asking regarding the allocation
of equipment for civilian defense under the $100,000,000
O.C.D. appropriation for procurement of supplies and
equipment for protection against bombing attacks. In
reply, General Gasser wrote in part:
“The
Office of Civilian Defense is not authorized to grant
any funds to counties or municipalities but can permit
loans of equipment such as auxiliary firefighting apparatus,
arm and insignia, protective clothing including steel
helmets, medical supplies and equipment, to be loaned
for local use. In addition, a limited number of gas
masks will be available, the distribution of which will
be determined by future events.”
“The
distribution of such equipment and supplies will be
made to the municipalities determined to be in need
of such protection. In making the final determination
of those localities to receive equipment, we are securing
the advice of the Army and Navy Munitions Board. Consideration
is being given to the protection of each community,
regardless of its size, where there is likelihood of
attack because of importance to national defense and
its location.”
General
Gasser then mentioned the nine municipalities which
are given preference and added:
“Beginning
with the communities considered to be in greatest danger,
we expect to supply equipment just as rapidly as its
manufacture can be completed. No further requisition
or application to obtain such equipment and material
is necessary. Upon final allocation of it, the proper
forms will be forwarded to the municipal officials by
the state director of civilian defense.”
Discuss this topic in our forums,
or send a letter to the editors. |