Kemper Memorial Debate Rolls On:
School Board, League of Women Voters &
Historical Society
by Joan R. Simon

Artist's sketch of School Board's Proposed Plan
(January 14, 2004) The flow of talk swirling
around the Kemper Memorial Park issue did not abate last
week, with
three community
groups
focusing on the Mamaroneck School
Board’s hotly debated proposal to move and reconfigure the memorial.( See: Moving
Memorial Back on the Drawing Board or Board - Kemper Family Positions
Six of the eight speakers at the School Board monthly meeting
on Tuesday evening supported the proposal, with several urging
the Kemper family to consider the changing needs of the community.
There was more opposition to the plan at the Larchmont Historical
Society discussion last Thursday night when School Board
Trustee Alan Parter informed the group that the school district’s
legal interpretation of the deed would enable a portion of
the memorial land to be used for a new field.
The Larchmont-Mamaroneck League of Women Voters also tackled
the controversy at their monthly Nautilus Breakfast last
Friday, with suggestions ranging from immediate legal recourse
to mediation as possible solutions to the current impasse
between the Mamaroneck School Board and the Kemper family.
SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Uphold the Deed

Adam Bisno: "Either you uphold [the deed] or you violate
it." |
The
first speaker at the January 13 meeting was Adam Bisno, a
former Mamaroneck High School student who
had contacted the Kemper family three years ago when the
School Board first proposed moving the Kemper Memorial. He
held up the deed to the property and said it “declares
this land ‘be maintained in perpetuity as a memorial.’” “Either
you uphold [the deed],” he said, “or
you violate it.” Excerpts
from the Deed
A Win-Win Situation
Most of the other speakers supported the Board’s plan. “I
truly believe it can be a win-win situation: the students
get a much-needed field and the veterans get an enhanced
memorial,” said Blythe Hamer, a mother of three children
in the district.

Bruce Cauley:"The
fallen did not die for a static, never-changing world,
but to support a dynamic one in which support for the
good was encouraged.” |
Former Village of Larchmont Trustee Bruce Cauley also spoke
in favor of moving the memorial. Cauley asserted, “The
fallen did not die for a static, never-changing world, but
to support a dynamic one in which support for the good was
encouraged.” He added, “It should not matter
when a community wishes to move a memorial so long as the
memorialization of the fallen is no less prominent to the
living after the move.” Cauley is a former US Navy
officer and currently an officer in the Naval Order of the
United States, which he described as “one of the country’s
oldest organizations which is dedicated to, among other things,
preserving and maintaining military memorials.”
Needs of Students Should Come First
Dr. Adrienne Weiss-Harrison, a Larchmont mother of two Mamaroneck
High School graduates and the Director of School Health
Services in New
Rochelle,
underscored how valuable athletic activity
was to students’ health and well-being. She noted, “Decisions
in a school district should be student-centered,” and
added, “I sincerely hope the conflict can be resolved
with the needs of the children in the community uppermost
in everyone’s mind.”
HISTORICAL SOCIETY MEETING
As part of a give and take before the Historical Society
on January 8, School Board President Bob Martin and Trustee
Alan Parter described the board’s revised plan for
the Kemper Memorial and displayed sketches of how the new
memorial park might look. Parter noted that the new design
would provide three things: a safer entrance, egress and
traffic flow for the parking area; an additional varsity
size playing field; and a more prominent and newly landscaped
memorial park to honor the 99 Larchmont and Mamaroneck veterans
who died in World War II.
What About the Deed?
When asked by Fred Baron, President of the Larchmont Historical
Society whether the school district had the legal authority
to take part of the original Kemper Memorial land for a playing
field, Parter maintained that the deed specified that the
land be “devoted to public and school uses” and
that this “language anticipated more than one use and
the possibility of change over time.” He also suggested
that the new field could be named after Lt. Kemper.
Baron expressed concern that “once you establish a
precedent of swapping land,” 25 years down the road,
it could be “moved to behind garbage cans.” Many
members were skeptical of Parter’s assurance that “a
document could be drawn up to prevent this.”
Cost of Memorial Move
Baron also asked where the money would come from for the
project. Parter replied that it would be incorporated into
a regular school budget, which is voted on by the community.
He expected the cost to be around $1.2 million, including
lights, but somewhat more if artificial turf is installed.
Is
a New Field Necessary?
Ned Benton, a Historical Society Trustee, inquired about
the need for an additional field. Parter replied that “extracurricular
activities are important to this Board,” and “active
students do better and are happier,” than non-active
students. He explained that the student population has increased
by 25% over the last decade and participation in athletics
by 27%. He noted that the school district owns only two varsity
sized fields and 3 other smaller fields. The high school
and Hommocks support 30 teams each year, with 246 varsity
games and 2000 practices. The schools use 7 other fields
that are owned and controlled by the three municipalities,
and 70% of play occurs on non-school fields.
Tony’s Nursery and Harbor Island
Tony’s Nursery was suggested as a possible field
site, but school officials responded that they had been told
the usable area was too small for a varsity field; nevertheless,
they welcomed the suggestion and promised to follow up on
it.
Harbor Island was also cited as a possible area for a new
field, but Martin noted that Village of Mamaroneck Mayor
Phil Trifiletti has informed the schools that they “should
not count on access to an additional field, should there
be one.”
LWV NAUTILUS BREAKFAST
With barely a break, the issue continued to be debated
at the League of Women Voters’ Nautilus breakfast the
following morning, January 9. School Board member Cecilia
Absher outlined the process that started in May, 2003 when
the Board reopened the topic with the Kemper family. The
revised plan for a newly configured Kemper Memorial was the
result of these early meetings.
Is Legal Action Inevitable?
A suggestion was made to pursue a legal resolution as soon
as possible, since the two sides appear to be irreconcilable.
Anne McAndrews, Village of Larchmont Trustee, cautioned that
the legal route could end up in years of appeals, and another
participant noted that the school district would need to “win
not only in a court of law, but also in the court of public
opinion.”
How About Mediation?
Alice Bloom, moderator of the League’s breakfast group,
urged the School Board to consider mediation as a way to
resolve the issue. Members also reminded the School Board
representative that the majority of district residents do
not have children in the schools, and alienating this group
could impact passage of school budgets.
Field Usage
There was debate over the importance of athletics and the
need for an additional field. A mother of children at all
three levels of schools noted that the lack of fields affected
average players more than elite players, who would have priority
with limited field space.
DID YOU KNOW?
Several interesting bits of information emerged at the
Historical Society’s
meeting: a piece of the original park was taken in order to widen the Boston
Post Road; the new design would reduce the number of parking spots in the
Post Road lot; the 99 war dead honored by the memorial were
not all Mamaroneck High
School graduates, as has been previously reported. Historical Society member
Bill Byrne clarified that they were all residents of the Mamaroneck School
District.
MORE MEETINGS TO COME
Though many attendees of the three
meetings expressed a desire to see the issue resolved quickly,
they are unlikely
to get their wish. Coming up are two major meetings on the
topic, the rescheduled discussion between the School Board
and the veterans, and the Board’s open community forum
on the topic. At this point, no dates have been announced.
Print This Article--For best results, highlight text, print selection
Email
this article
|