| The following press release was received by the
Gazette and is reprinted here without editing or comment.
We will provide space for press releases from all legitimate
candidates for local public office.
Bramson chokes on his own words:
Bramson's IKEA record haunts him
Press Release ( October 18, 2002
) In recent debates Assemblyman Tocci (D-New Rochelle)
has challenged his opponent Noam Bramson to defend his
record on the issue of IKEA, which affected the communities
of New Rochelle, Larchmont, and Mamaroneck.
"Bramson seems to have trouble remembering his
position on the IKEA issue. He is trying to hoodwink
the people into believing that he was opposed to the
project, while the record shows his unquestioned support
for IKEA." Tocci said.
On WVOX Bramson stated "That the distress that
it (IKEA) would have caused to the people who would
have been dislocated could not be justified by the economic
benefits, if any associated with the project."
This is in direct contradiction to Bramson's voting
record and the position he takes publicly. Bramson stated.
"If indeed IKEA is genuinely interested in this
site, then that increases the probability of this deal
ultimately occurring. I've always thought it was an
appealing concept; it's just a matter of whether the
numbers add up. It's good news that they are interested."
(Journal News, December 10, 1998)
Bramson later claims he was legally obligated not
to speak out against this project, but there is no documentation
that confirms his "gag order." Bramson showed
strong support for the IKEA project throughout the entire
ordeal. He even voted against the best interests of
the residents and businesses he represents and designated
the area blighted which paved the way for the property
to be taken (by eminent domain) for IKEA's benefit.
"Because of this blighted designation people
in this neighborhood were coerced into selling their
homes and businesses for less then market value. Bramson
showed no sensitivity for their welfare as he was blinded
by dollar signs." Tocci said.
The following year the record still showed Bramson's
wholehearted support for IKEA. He is quoted in the New
Rochelle Sound Report saying, "The decision to
uproot residents and business owners was a 'difficult'
one but the project's benefits outweigh its drawbacks."
(New Rochelle Sound Report, 1999)
Bramson's rhetoric only began to change on the issue
when he received local opposition. His constituents
began to speak out against the project and against Bramson's
lack of concern for their now blighted neighborhood.
Tocci, on the other hand, voiced early opposition
of IKEA. "The Draft Environmental Impact Study
proved to me what I already knew; the suburban character
of New Rochelle, Larchmont, and Mamaroneck neighborhoods
would have been destroyed. IKEA was just not right for
this area and would have been a complete environmental
disaster."
Send
this page to a friend
Discuss this topic in our forums,
or send a letter
to the editors.
|